From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752380AbZHLWps (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:45:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751896AbZHLWps (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:45:48 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:34521 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751056AbZHLWpr (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:45:47 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:43:19 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Pavel Machek Cc: Pekka Enberg , Joe Perches , Ben Dooks , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, David John , Erik Mouw , kernel list , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARM sections Message-ID: <20090812224319.GC24667@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1249563730.10297.13.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20090806133349.GF27773@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1249568614.10297.20.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20090806150322.GX2080@trinity.fluff.org> <1249948147.8895.96.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20090812115520.GI24339@elf.ucw.cz> <20090812194838.GB12117@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <84144f020908121317g64551a2cu1b960f44ed5d0d9@mail.gmail.com> <20090812212502.GA24667@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090812220029.GA1387@ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090812220029.GA1387@ucw.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:00:30AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > I haven't noticed a great rush of support for Joe's patch, which > > > > could mean that people here really aren't that bothered - maybe > > > > they just aren't "open list" zealots like some people seem to be. > > > > > > I for one support open lists because subscriber-only lists are a PITA > > > > Let me make this clear, yet again. The lists are *not* subscriber only > > lists. We do NOT reject non-subscriber posts for no reason what so ever > > (although it does seem to have happened, both Erik and myself both > > contend that we have never rejected a mailing intentionally without > > giving a reason - whether the original poster receives that reason is > > a function of how buggy mailman is.) > > FAQ still states that cc-ing between l-k and lakml is > unwelcome. Reason why people prefer open lists is that you can cc both > l-k and the other relevant list. Yes, because the FAQ tends to be out of date unless someone either sends me a patch or I actually read it and correct things in there. The FAQ is more or less something I never read, but end up looking after. I'll see about updating it at some point.