From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752543AbZHMDGs (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:06:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751371AbZHMDGs (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:06:48 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f196.google.com ([209.85.222.196]:63789 "EHLO mail-pz0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751184AbZHMDGr (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:06:47 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ib1vR3LSb775Ct2fIk2ecupS54y9poipbyKbyareTo7Qrc6AfMQuJrGgS0gPvkWqaw 71y1QmefiDesS9N2XGABADBvxqQFCHfph3qHbdd1gOqjpLhIkj9Smws++qRc3NtGPUjt WXHwHkvijbFEiEWflgc87eimfG1CGJNBmnU4o= Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:09:03 +0800 From: Amerigo Wang To: Stefani Seibold Cc: linux-kernel , Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] new kfifo API Message-ID: <20090813030903.GC5031@cr0.nay.redhat.com> References: <1250029873.17599.98.camel@wall-e> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1250029873.17599.98.camel@wall-e> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:31:13AM +0200, Stefani Seibold wrote: >This is a proposal of a new generic kernel FIFO implementation. >The patch is splitted into 7 parts: > Part 1: Code reorganization, no functional change > Part 2: Move out spinlock > Part 3: Cleanup namespace > Part 4: rename kfifo_put... -> kfifo_in... and kfifo_get... -> kfifo_out... > Part 5: add DEFINE_KFIFO and friends, add very tiny functions > Part 6: add kfifo_from_user and kfifo_to_user > Part 7: add record handling functions (does some reorg) Hi, Stefani Can you put these patches into one thread? I have to search my inbox to find all of them. :) And, personally I don't like your splitting of these patches, I prefer to see kfifo API changes first, then their usages. Anyway, nice work! Thanks!