From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756329AbZHMVIA (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:08:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755148AbZHMVH7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:07:59 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:35522 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755118AbZHMVH7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:07:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 23:07:01 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Joe Perches , Alan Cox , Pekka Enberg , Ben Dooks , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, David John , Erik Mouw , kernel list , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARM sections Message-ID: <20090813210701.GA23001@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20090812115520.GI24339@elf.ucw.cz> <20090812194838.GB12117@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <84144f020908121317g64551a2cu1b960f44ed5d0d9@mail.gmail.com> <20090812212502.GA24667@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090813103511.2928a085@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20090813094736.GZ6132@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1250158593.28285.23.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20090813103513.GC6132@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1250161714.28285.61.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20090813115444.GB10450@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090813115444.GB10450@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 2009-08-13 12:54:44, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 04:08:34AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 11:35 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > And... have your emails been held for moderation recently? > > > > Umm... (while chuckling) > > Yes. The reason being is you removed the 'Re:' from the subject > line but still pressed "reply". I don't think that's valid reason to reject mail. > We have an etiquette item which discourages that - we have people > who like to use the "reply" button to start a completely new and Unfortunately, people writing from lkml do not know about that "etiquette" item, and it directly interferes with sending patch series. > So chuckle all you want. This is one of the things we _do_ get right > to improve the overall quality for existing subscribers, and make the > archives more searchable. No, I do not think you got that right. lkml is more friendly place to write to, because it does not have strange rules such as this one. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html