From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752937AbZHNJZc (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:25:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752693AbZHNJZb (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:25:31 -0400 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:48534 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752032AbZHNJZb (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:25:31 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:18:08 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Daniel Mack Cc: Joe Perches , Alan Cox , Pekka Enberg , Pavel Machek , Ben Dooks , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, David John , Erik Mouw , kernel list , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARM sections Message-ID: <20090814091808.GA2662@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20090812194838.GB12117@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <84144f020908121317g64551a2cu1b960f44ed5d0d9@mail.gmail.com> <20090812212502.GA24667@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090813103511.2928a085@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20090813094736.GZ6132@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1250158593.28285.23.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20090813103513.GC6132@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1250161714.28285.61.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20090813115444.GB10450@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090814075919.GG19257@buzzloop.caiaq.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090814075919.GG19257@buzzloop.caiaq.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 09:59:19AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > One common false positive to this rule is using 'git send-email' with a > message ID as reference. There won't be a 'Re:' in that case. Yes, and they are HELD FOR MODERATION so that a HUMAN can make a DECISION on whether to let them through. We could, alternatively, discard them outright. We think that discarding due to a rule matching is unacceptable though. These lists are getting close to me just pulling the plug on them. The amount of crap flying around about them is getting too great for me to continue to provide such a service to this community. When I pull them, I'll pull *all* the linux-arm related lists. Someone else can provide and run the mailing lists. I estimate that this will happen this evening. Really. Because I don't see this thread settling down.