From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754918AbZHNLQd (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:16:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752351AbZHNLQc (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:16:32 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:45583 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752115AbZHNLQc (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:16:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:16:22 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Alan Cox , Pekka Enberg , Joe Perches , Ben Dooks , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, David John , Erik Mouw , kernel list , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARM sections Message-ID: <20090814111622.GG32418@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20090806133349.GF27773@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <1249568614.10297.20.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20090806150322.GX2080@trinity.fluff.org> <1249948147.8895.96.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20090812115520.GI24339@elf.ucw.cz> <20090812194838.GB12117@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <84144f020908121317g64551a2cu1b960f44ed5d0d9@mail.gmail.com> <20090812212502.GA24667@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090813103511.2928a085@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20090813094736.GZ6132@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090813094736.GZ6132@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 2009-08-13 10:47:36, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:35:11AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > O> Let me make this clear, yet again. The lists are *not* subscriber only > > > lists. We do NOT reject non-subscriber posts for no reason what so ever > > > (although it does seem to have happened, both Erik and myself both > > > contend that we have never rejected a mailing intentionally without > > > giving a reason - whether the original poster receives that reason is > > > a function of how buggy mailman is.) > > > > Does it matter one iota whether mailman is rejecting the posts or you > > are. It's a long standing nuisance. And if the software is that buggy why > > not move it to vger which works and has its own active maintainers which > > will free up your time ? > > As I've already pointed out in previous threads, people believe that they > should talk to me about ARM mailing lists. Proven, multiple times by > multiple people. > > Fact: These lists have _TWO_ admins. Fact: Everyone only talks to me > about problems with these lists. Fact: they do not copy Erik. Yes, and you wonder? Read that outdated FAQ you are posting to the list so often. Fact: it is From: you, and it mentions a lot of stuff but it does not tell us that Erik is the list admin. Moving to vger will actually help here, as "everyone" knows that davem maintains that. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html