From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755282AbZHNL0I (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:26:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755171AbZHNL0H (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:26:07 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:53674 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755126AbZHNL0G (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:26:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:25:56 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Daniel Mack , Joe Perches , Alan Cox , Pekka Enberg , Ben Dooks , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, David John , Erik Mouw , kernel list , Andrew Morton , David Miller , Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add "L: linux-arm@vger.kernel.org" to ARM sections Message-ID: <20090814112556.GK32418@elf.ucw.cz> References: <84144f020908121317g64551a2cu1b960f44ed5d0d9@mail.gmail.com> <20090812212502.GA24667@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090813103511.2928a085@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20090813094736.GZ6132@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1250158593.28285.23.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20090813103513.GC6132@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1250161714.28285.61.camel@Joe-Laptop.home> <20090813115444.GB10450@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090814075919.GG19257@buzzloop.caiaq.de> <20090814091808.GA2662@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090814091808.GA2662@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri 2009-08-14 10:18:08, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 09:59:19AM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > > One common false positive to this rule is using 'git send-email' with a > > message ID as reference. There won't be a 'Re:' in that case. > > Yes, and they are HELD FOR MODERATION so that a HUMAN can make a DECISION > on whether to let them through. We could, alternatively, discard them > outright. We think that discarding due to a rule matching is unacceptable > though. > > These lists are getting close to me just pulling the plug on them. The > amount of crap flying around about them is getting too great for me to > continue to provide such a service to this community. When I pull them, > I'll pull *all* the linux-arm related lists. > > Someone else can provide and run the mailing lists. davem indicated that he's happy to run the mailing lists. Now, I don't know why you are pulling non-kernel arm-related maillists into the picture. Those are not normally cced by kernel people, so they not cause problems. Blackmail? > I estimate that this will happen this evening. Really. Because I don't > see this thread settling down. If pulling the plug on them is the only way to get useful mailing list for linux-arm-kernel, go ahead! Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html