From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755617AbZHORMh (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:12:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755343AbZHORMg (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:12:36 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:60679 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754177AbZHORMg (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:12:36 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 19:11:57 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk, benh@kernel.crashing.org, Josh Triplett Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip/core/rcu 6/6] Fix typo in rcu_irq_exit() comment header. Message-ID: <20090815171157.GA5790@elte.hu> References: <20090815165153.GA8886@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20090815170009.GB9265@elte.hu> <20090815171024.GJ6725@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090815171024.GJ6725@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 07:00:09PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > > From: Paul E. McKenney > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Josh Triplett > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney > > > > Judging from the signoff order, this is suppose dto be "From: John > > Triplett", right? > > Indeed it is!!! > > Well, now I know why one uses "git am" even when just making the > change would be less typing. Sorry for my confusion!!! no problem - i fixed it up. Ingo