From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751315AbZHRVol (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:44:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750818AbZHRVol (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:44:41 -0400 Received: from ru.mvista.com ([213.79.90.228]:43925 "EHLO buildserver.ru.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750802AbZHRVok (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:44:40 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 01:44:40 +0400 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Artem Bityutskiy Cc: Andrew Morton , Ben Dooks , David Brownell , David Woodhouse , Grant Likely , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Jean Delvare , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Device table matching for SPI subsystem Message-ID: <20090818214440.GA21391@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> Reply-To: avorontsov@ru.mvista.com References: <20090731003957.GA23982@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <1249889723.19638.13.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1249889723.19638.13.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:35:23AM +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 04:39 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > Andrew, > > > > This new patch set overwrites following patches: > > > > hwmon-lm70-convert-to-device-table-matching.patch > > hwmon-adxx-convert-to-device-table-matching.patch > > spi-merge-probe-and-probe_id-callbacks.patch > > spi-prefix-modalias-with-spi.patch > > of-remove-stmm25p40-alias.patch > > mtd-m25p80-convert-to-device-table-matching.patch > > spi-add-support-for-device-table-matching.patch > > Are you going to send v3 and address David's comments? No v3, but I'm going to address David's comments in a follow up patch set where I'll change the probing code anyway. > Do you want some of these patches to go via the MTD tree or > they better go as a series via some other tree? Um.. The MTD patches depend on SPI subsystem changes... If David and Andrew are OK with SPI patches going through MTD tree, then I'm fine with it as well. Thanks, -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2