From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751160AbZHSIne (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:43:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751032AbZHSInd (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:43:33 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.174]:30779 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750916AbZHSInc (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:43:32 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=V+5AmwtUXlCcHWQulMeYbTfOYlonirRJjAEIK/rxPzYx190YLasxM1VKPhnQL7JVhd s5DDsOo1dqs8TEtl+yiHPUWaapKpmY4xx7DaNlBtmNICd9qTe5EYF99YSei7Jn7Q19jC 6DYxeY7DjgAmjIFSYj6qJOc00a4l4xm3N2aY0= Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:42:26 +0900 From: Minchan Kim To: Nitin Gupta Cc: Minchan Kim , Chungki woo , Mel Gorman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com, riel@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com Subject: Re: abnormal OOM killer message Message-Id: <20090819174226.2ee49547.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop> In-Reply-To: References: <18eba5a10908181841t145e4db1wc2daf90f7337aa6e@mail.gmail.com> <20090819114408.ab9c8a78.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop> <4A8B7508.4040001@vflare.org> <20090819135105.e6b69a8d.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop> <18eba5a10908182324x45261d06y83e0f042e9ee6b20@mail.gmail.com> <20090819154958.18a34aa5.minchan.kim@barrios-desktop> <18eba5a10908190014q6f903399y30478b4c0a7f256b@mail.gmail.com> <28c262360908190029j1153b00fva11c4a215d5932d6@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.16.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 13:55:44 +0530 Nitin Gupta wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Chungki woo wrote: > >>> You means your pages with 79M are swap out in compcache's reserved > >>> memory? > >> > >> Compcache don't have reserved memory. > >> When it needs memory, and then allocate memory. > > > > Okay. reserved is not important. :) > > My point was that 79M with pages are swap out in compcache swap device ? > > Is the number real ? > > Can we believe it ? > > > > > I would suggest moving compcache related discussion over to > linux-mm-cc AT laptop DOT org > as this might not be of such general interest. I would be glad to > discuss your doubts in detail. Thanks. But we still don't find exact cause. I am not sure this is campcache problem or buddy allocator problem. First of all, we have to make sure it. :) > See you over there. > > Thanks, > Nitin -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim