From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751248AbZHXB4J (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:56:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751223AbZHXB4H (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:56:07 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:60870 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751212AbZHXB4E (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:56:04 -0400 Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:56:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20090823.185617.36449822.davem@davemloft.net> To: jirislaby@gmail.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@ghostprotocols.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] NET: llc, zero sockaddr_llc struct From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1250967535-30692-1-git-send-email-jirislaby@gmail.com> References: <1250967535-30692-1-git-send-email-jirislaby@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jiri Slaby Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:58:55 +0200 > sllc_arphrd member of sockaddr_llc might not be set. Zero sllc > before copying it to the above layers. > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo I know it seems arbitrary, but could you please memset() on the structure instead of using an empty initializer so that it's consistent with how all other ->getname() implementations deal with this issue? It's easier to audit that way. Thanks.