From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751942AbZHZTQX (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:16:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751821AbZHZTQW (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:16:22 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:41973 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751229AbZHZTQV (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:16:21 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:16:19 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Frans Pop Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lenb@intel.com, rui.zhang@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ACPI processor: force throttling state when BIOS returns incorrect value Message-Id: <20090826121619.2bc7e72b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <200908171443.35622.elendil@planet.nl> References: <200908171443.35622.elendil@planet.nl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:43:34 +0200 Frans Pop wrote: > --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c > @@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ struct throttling_tstate { > #define THROTTLING_POSTCHANGE (2) > > static int acpi_processor_get_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr); > -int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr, int state); > +int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr, > + int state, bool force); > WARNING: externs should be avoided in .c files #74: FILE: drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c:65: +int acpi_processor_set_throttling(struct acpi_processor *pr, total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 137 lines checked checkpatch speaketh truth - there's already a declaration in acpi/processor.h anyway. I'll leave it alone though. Cleaning up acpi code isn't on the agenda for today. Please integrate checkpatch into your patch preparation tools. It finds stuff.