From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750961AbZH0RDp (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:03:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750913AbZH0RDo (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:03:44 -0400 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([193.131.176.58]:34803 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750738AbZH0RDn (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:03:43 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 0/2] kmemleak: x86-related patches To: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Catalin Marinas Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:02:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20090827165927.27901.97270.stgit@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> User-Agent: StGit/0.15-rc2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Aug 2009 17:02:47.0895 (UTC) FILETIME=[34156670:01CA2738] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I plan to submit these two x86-related patches for 2.6.32. Are the x86 people OK with them (so that I can add the relevant ack)? Thanks. Catalin Marinas (2): kmemleak: Inform kmemleak about kernel stack allocation kmemleak: Ignore the aperture memory hole on x86_64 Documentation/kmemleak.txt | 11 +++++------ arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 7 ++++++- arch/x86/kernel/aperture_64.c | 6 ++++++ arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c | 6 ++++++ arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 2 ++ kernel/fork.c | 7 ++++++- mm/kmemleak.c | 22 ---------------------- 7 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) -- Catalin