From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751934AbZH1SRW (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:17:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751562AbZH1SRW (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:17:22 -0400 Received: from e28smtp06.in.ibm.com ([59.145.155.6]:43673 "EHLO e28smtp06.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751493AbZH1SRV (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:17:21 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:47:19 +0530 From: Balbir Singh To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gautham R Shenoy , Andreas Herrmann Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/6] load-balancing and cpu_power Message-ID: <20090828181719.GW4889@balbir.in.ibm.com> Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20090827150051.846026837@chello.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090827150051.846026837@chello.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Peter Zijlstra [2009-08-27 17:00:51]: > Hi > > These are utterly untested patches, and even if they'd compile I guess they'll > balance your system straight like a banana. But it should show the direction > I'm wanting to take this thing. > > I'll continue prodding at this, but wanted to put this out early so we don't > all start doing the same, and so that you can poke holes in it early. > Let me put them on my TODO queue for testing. -- Balbir