From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751911AbZH2HfK (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Aug 2009 03:35:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751882AbZH2HfJ (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Aug 2009 03:35:09 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:46892 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751877AbZH2HfI (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Aug 2009 03:35:08 -0400 Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:34:55 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Len Brown Cc: x86@kernel.org, sfi-devel@simplefirmware.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] SFI: Simple Firmware Interface - v3 Message-ID: <20090829073455.GA27559@elte.hu> References: <1250282295-25216-1-git-send-email-lenb@kernel.org> <20090817100628.GA21498@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Len Brown wrote: > > > Ok, this iteration is even nicer. > > Thank you, Ingo, both for the thoughtful review, > and your kind words. > > > Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar > > > > A patch technical request/suggestion. I guess you'd like to keep > > these bits in the ACPI tree, so that you can test it and merge it > > with ongoing ACPI changes, right? > > > > That would be fine to me for all the arch/x86/ touching patches, > > except for this one: > > > > [PATCH 05/11] ACPI, x86: expose some IO-APIC routines when CONFIG_ACPI=n > > > > I'd like to pick this one up into tip:x86/apic, because there's > > ongoing work in this area. (also, by the looks of it, i'd not be > > surprised if this patch needed some testing. This is fragile code > > with quirky Kconfig dependencies.) > > > > I can create a standalone topic for this (based on .31-rc6), > > containing this single commit, which you could pull into the ACPI > > tree? That way we both can have this commit and nobody is held up, > > and both trees can be pushed to Linus in the .32 merge window, > > independently of each other. > > Sure. > > Go ahead and pull that patch onto an 2.6.31-rc8 based branch from here: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-sfi-2.6.git for-ingo > > As the previous patches did not depend on it, I simply rebased > that one to rc8 and moved the other patches after it. Pulled, thanks Len! Ingo