From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752489AbZH2TAw (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:00:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752439AbZH2TAw (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:00:52 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:47161 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752421AbZH2TAv (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Aug 2009 15:00:51 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Mikael Pettersson Subject: Re: [Bug #14015] pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 21:01:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.0 (Linux/2.6.31-rc8-rjw; KDE/4.3.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List References: <19096.15539.205951.931871@pilspetsen.it.uu.se> <19097.14413.89047.384281@pilspetsen.it.uu.se> In-Reply-To: <19097.14413.89047.384281@pilspetsen.it.uu.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200908292101.38800.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 29 August 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > Mikael Pettersson writes: > > Rafael J. Wysocki writes: > > > On Thursday 27 August 2009, Mikael Pettersson wrote: > > > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:34:53 +0200 (CEST), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > > > from 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > > > > (either way). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D14015 > > > > > Subject : pty regressed again, breaking expect and gcc's testsuite > > > > > Submitter : Mikael Pettersson > > > > > Date : 2009-08-14 23:41 (12 days old) > > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux-kernel&m=3D125029329805643&w=3D4 > > > > > > > > Not fixed. With 2.6.31-rc7 I'm still seeing repeatable testsuite > > > > failures on powerpc64. Reverting to 2.6.30 makes the failures go away. > > > > > > Thanks for the update. > > > > > > I guess 2.6.31-rc8 doesn't make any difference, does it? > > > > I've scheduled a number of gcc bootstraps and testsuite runs > > with -rc8 on x86, powerpc64, and arm. I'll post an update in > > a day or so. > > 2.6.31-rc8 results in bogus testsuite failures on all three platforms. That may be a result of the known inotify borkage in -rc8 that has been fixed in the current Linus' tree. Thanks, Rafael