From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -mm 1/2] do_wait-wakeup-optimization: fix child_wait_callback()->eligible_child() usage
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 14:23:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090901122325.GB20989@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090901122240.GA20989@redhat.com>
(on top of do_wait-wakeup-optimization-child_wait_callback-check-__wnothread-case.patch,
fixes do_wait-wakeup-optimization-change-__wake_up_parent-to-use-filtered-wakeup.patch)
child_wait_callback()->eligible_child() is not right, we can miss the
wakeup if the task was detached before __wake_up_parent() and the caller
of do_wait() didn't use __WALL.
Move ->wo_pid checks from eligible_child() to the new helper, eligible_pid(),
and change child_wait_callback() to use it instead of eligible_child().
Note: actually I think it would be better to fix the __WCLONE check in
eligible_child(), it doesn't look exactly right. But it is not clear what
is the supposed behaviour, and any change is user-visible.
Reported-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/exit.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- WAIT/kernel/exit.c~2_WAKE_PARENT_ELIGIBLE_FIX 2009-09-01 12:49:27.000000000 +0200
+++ WAIT/kernel/exit.c 2009-09-01 12:59:23.000000000 +0200
@@ -1106,13 +1106,16 @@ static struct pid *task_pid_type(struct
return pid;
}
-static int eligible_child(struct wait_opts *wo, struct task_struct *p)
+static inline int eligible_pid(struct wait_opts *wo, struct task_struct *p)
{
- if (wo->wo_type < PIDTYPE_MAX) {
- if (task_pid_type(p, wo->wo_type) != wo->wo_pid)
- return 0;
- }
+ return wo->wo_type == PIDTYPE_MAX ||
+ task_pid_type(p, wo->wo_type) == wo->wo_pid;
+}
+static int eligible_child(struct wait_opts *wo, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ if (!eligible_pid(wo, p))
+ return 0;
/* Wait for all children (clone and not) if __WALL is set;
* otherwise, wait for clone children *only* if __WCLONE is
* set; otherwise, wait for non-clone children *only*. (Note:
@@ -1564,7 +1567,7 @@ static int child_wait_callback(wait_queu
child_wait);
struct task_struct *p = key;
- if (!eligible_child(wo, p))
+ if (!eligible_pid(wo, p))
return 0;
if ((wo->wo_flags & __WNOTHREAD) && wait->private != p->parent)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-01 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-24 23:28 mmotm 2009-08-24-16-24 uploaded akpm
2009-08-25 10:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-26 4:52 ` Amerigo Wang
2009-08-26 6:54 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-26 3:15 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-26 3:36 ` Andrew Morton
2009-08-26 3:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-27 5:44 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-27 6:17 ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2009-08-27 6:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-27 7:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-27 9:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-08-27 9:43 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-27 10:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-08-27 10:31 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-27 10:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-08-28 17:17 ` eligible_child() && __WCLONE && task_detached() (Was: mmotm 2009-08-24-16-24 uploaded) Oleg Nesterov
2009-08-28 19:16 ` Roland McGrath
2009-09-01 12:22 ` [PATCH -mm 0/2] fix do_wait(!__WALL) hang " Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-01 12:23 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2009-09-10 0:36 ` [PATCH -mm 1/2] do_wait-wakeup-optimization: fix child_wait_callback()->eligible_child() usage KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-09-01 12:24 ` [PATCH -mm 2/2] do_wait-wakeup-optimization: simplify task_pid_type() Oleg Nesterov
2009-08-27 10:17 ` mmotm 2009-08-24-16-24 uploaded KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-08-27 9:37 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090901122325.GB20989@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome