mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] sys_setrlimit: make sure ->rlim_max never grows
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 19:21:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090903172145.GB27161@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A9FC8DA.4090001@gmail.com>

Mostly preparation for Jiri's changes, but probably makes sense anyway.

sys_setrlimit() checks new_rlim.rlim_max <= old_rlim->rlim_max, but when
it takes task_lock() old_rlim->rlim_max can be already lowered. Move this
check under task_lock().

Currently this is not important, we can only race with our sub-thread,
this means the application is stupid. But when we change the code to allow
the update of !current task's limits, it becomes important to make sure
->rlim_max can be lowered "reliably" even if we race with the application
doing sys_setrlimit().

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---

 kernel/sys.c |   16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- WAIT/kernel/sys.c~SETRLIMIT	2009-06-17 14:11:26.000000000 +0200
+++ WAIT/kernel/sys.c	2009-09-03 19:01:48.000000000 +0200
@@ -1247,10 +1247,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(setrlimit, unsigned int,
 		return -EFAULT;
 	if (new_rlim.rlim_cur > new_rlim.rlim_max)
 		return -EINVAL;
-	old_rlim = current->signal->rlim + resource;
-	if ((new_rlim.rlim_max > old_rlim->rlim_max) &&
-	    !capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
-		return -EPERM;
 	if (resource == RLIMIT_NOFILE && new_rlim.rlim_max > sysctl_nr_open)
 		return -EPERM;
 
@@ -1268,13 +1264,17 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(setrlimit, unsigned int,
 		new_rlim.rlim_cur = 1;
 	}
 
+	old_rlim = current->signal->rlim + resource;
 	task_lock(current->group_leader);
-	*old_rlim = new_rlim;
+	if ((new_rlim.rlim_max <= old_rlim->rlim_max) ||
+				capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
+		*old_rlim = new_rlim;
+	else
+		retval = -EPERM;
 	task_unlock(current->group_leader);
 
-	if (resource != RLIMIT_CPU)
+	if (retval || resource != RLIMIT_CPU)
 		goto out;
-
 	/*
 	 * RLIMIT_CPU handling.   Note that the kernel fails to return an error
 	 * code if it rejected the user's attempt to set RLIMIT_CPU.  This is a
@@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(setrlimit, unsigned int,
 
 	update_rlimit_cpu(new_rlim.rlim_cur);
 out:
-	return 0;
+	return retval;
 }
 
 /*


      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-03 17:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-02  9:45 [PATCH 1/2] core: add lockless update_rlimit_cpu Jiri Slaby
2009-09-02  9:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] core: allow setrlimit to non-current tasks Jiri Slaby
2009-09-02  9:47   ` Jiri Slaby
2009-09-02 13:50   ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-02 18:44     ` Jiri Slaby
2009-09-02 21:51       ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-03 13:47         ` Jiri Slaby
2009-09-03 13:52           ` [PATCH] " Jiri Slaby
2009-09-03 17:41             ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-03 20:08               ` [PATCH v2 1/8] SECURITY: selinux, fix update_rlimit_cpu parameter Jiri Slaby
2009-09-03 20:08               ` [PATCH v2 2/8] SECURITY: add task_struct to setrlimit Jiri Slaby
2009-09-03 20:08               ` [PATCH v2 3/8] core: add task_struct to update_rlimit_cpu Jiri Slaby
2009-09-03 20:08               ` [PATCH v2 4/8] sys_setrlimit: make sure ->rlim_max never grows Jiri Slaby
2009-09-03 20:08               ` [PATCH v2 5/8] core: split sys_setrlimit Jiri Slaby
2009-09-03 20:08               ` [PATCH v2 6/8] core: allow setrlimit to non-current tasks Jiri Slaby
2009-09-03 20:08               ` [PATCH v2 7/8] core: optimize setrlimit for current task Jiri Slaby
2009-09-03 20:08               ` [PATCH v2 8/8] FS: proc, make limits writable Jiri Slaby
2009-09-04 14:26                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-10-08 20:55                   ` Jiri Slaby
2009-10-12 15:13                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-03 17:20           ` [PATCH 0/1] sys_setrlimit: make sure ->rlim_max never grows Oleg Nesterov
2009-09-03 17:21           ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090903172145.GB27161@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome