Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86/i386: Make sure stack-protector segment base is cache aligned

[Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>]

On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 23:18:05 +0200
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:

> 
> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 09/03/2009 01:45 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > > 
> > > Two problems:
> > > 
> > >     * gcc generates %gs: references for stack-protector, but we
> > > use %fs for percpu data (because restoring %fs is faster if it's
> > > a null selector; TLS uses %gs).  I guess we could use %fs if
> > >       !CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR, or %gs if we are using it
> > > (though that has some fiddly ramifications for things like
> > > ptrace).
> > 
> > Well, by touching two segments we're getting the worst of both 
> > worlds, so at least assuming some significant number of real-world 
> > deployments use CC_STACKPROTECTOR, we really don't want to 
> > pessimize that case too much.
> 
> Fedora has stackprotector enabled so it's used in a widespread way.
> 
> 	Ingo

the other issue is that afaik we want the kernel to use the other
register than userspace does...


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org