mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
	544145@bugs.debian.org, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com>
Subject: Re: 32bit binaries on x86_64/Xen segfaults in syscall-vdso
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 20:19:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090904181939.GA9077@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090904174605.GA8396@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org>

On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 07:46:05PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 09:07:39AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > On 09/03/09 15:36, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > This function looks weird. It tries to restores the user code segment.
> > > But the documentation from AMD explicitely stat that the CS and SS are
> > > restored from the STAR register.
> | #define FLAT_RING3_CS32 0xe023
> | wrmsr(MSR_STAR, 0, (FLAT_RING3_CS32<<16) | __HYPERVISOR_CS);
> But this does not match my observation either.

Well, it does. The values for a long-mode program within Xen:

| cs             0xe033   57395
| ss             0xe02b   57387

Values on the bare hardware:

| cs             0x33     51
| ss             0x2b     43

Values for a compatibility-mode program on the bare hardware:

| cs             0x23     35
| ss             0x2b     43

So Xen adds 0xe000 (no idea what that means), but the Linux kernel
expects the value without.  Long mode is not affected.

Okay, I tried the test program again and yes, it jumps back into
long-mode. (See the 0x10 in the restored CS[1].)

| cs             0xe033   57395
| ss             0xe02b   57387

Bastian

[1]: http://amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/white_papers_and_tech_docs/24593.pdf,
     page 151
-- 
Where there's no emotion, there's no motive for violence.
		-- Spock, "Dagger of the Mind", stardate 2715.1

      reply	other threads:[~2009-09-04 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-30 18:16 Bastian Blank
2009-09-03 20:51 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-03 22:02   ` Bastian Blank
2009-09-03 22:06     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-03 22:36       ` Bastian Blank
2009-09-04 16:07         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-04 16:20           ` Bastian Blank
2009-09-04 16:56             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-09-04 17:46           ` Bastian Blank
2009-09-04 18:19             ` Bastian Blank [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090904181939.GA9077@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org \
    --to=waldi@debian.org \
    --cc=544145@bugs.debian.org \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=keir.fraser@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®