From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755027AbZIFL1m (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Sep 2009 07:27:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752602AbZIFL1l (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Sep 2009 07:27:41 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50949 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752235AbZIFL1k (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Sep 2009 07:27:40 -0400 Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 04:27:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20090906.042755.131133892.davem@davemloft.net> To: ijc@hellion.org.uk Cc: stable@kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl, walt@holmansrus.com, kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, khc@pm.waw.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Bug #14057] Strange network timeouts w/ e100 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1252236178.7811.28024.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200908262312.04000.rjw@sisk.pl> <20090826.151153.169388217.davem@davemloft.net> <1252236178.7811.28024.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by alpha.home.local id n86BRu16020078 From: Ian Campbell Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2009 12:22:58 +0100 > On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 15:11 -0700, David Miller wrote: >> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" >> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:12:03 +0200 >> >> >> Krzysztof has a patch which has corrected this issue for me. Thanks, >> > >> > Thanks for the update. >> > >> > Do you have a pointer to the patch, please? >> >> commit 6ff9c2e7fa8ca63a575792534b63c5092099c286 >> Author: Krzysztof Hałasa >> Date: Sun Aug 23 19:02:13 2009 -0700 >> >> E100: fix interaction with swiotlb on X86. > > This fixes 303d67c2 which has been included in at least the 2.6.27.29 > and 2.6.30.5 stable releases so I think this should be a candidate for > those stable branches too. Absolutely, I'll take care of this. {.n++%ݶw{.n+{G{ayʇڙ,jfhz_(階ݢj"mG?&~iOzv^m ?I