From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753379AbZIIPx3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:53:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752817AbZIIPx2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:53:28 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:48049 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752369AbZIIPx2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2009 11:53:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 17:53:30 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: Wu Fengguang Cc: Andrew Morton , Jens Axboe , Dave Chinner , Chris Mason , Peter Zijlstra , Christoph Hellwig , jack@suse.cz, Artem Bityutskiy , LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/7] writeback: fix queue_io() ordering Message-ID: <20090909155330.GE7949@duck.suse.cz> References: <20090909145141.293229693@intel.com> <20090909150600.451373732@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090909150600.451373732@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 09-09-09 22:51:43, Wu Fengguang wrote: > This was not a bug, since b_io is empty for kupdate writeback. > The next patch will do requeue_io() for non-kupdate writeback, > so let's fix it. But doesn't this patch also need your "anti-starvation" patch? Looking into the code, we put inode to b_more_io when nr_to_write drops to zero and this way we'd just start writing it again in the next round... Honza > > CC: Dave Chinner > Cc: Martin Bligh > Cc: Michael Rubin > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu > --- > fs/fs-writeback.c | 7 +++++-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > --- linux.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2009-09-09 21:41:14.000000000 +0800 > +++ linux/fs/fs-writeback.c 2009-09-09 21:45:15.000000000 +0800 > @@ -313,11 +313,14 @@ static void move_expired_inodes(struct l > } > > /* > - * Queue all expired dirty inodes for io, eldest first. > + * Queue all expired dirty inodes for io, eldest first: > + * (newly dirtied) => b_dirty inodes > + * => b_more_io inodes > + * => remaining inodes in b_io => (dequeue for sync) > */ > static void queue_io(struct bdi_writeback *wb, unsigned long *older_than_this) > { > - list_splice_init(&wb->b_more_io, wb->b_io.prev); > + list_splice_init(&wb->b_more_io, &wb->b_io); > move_expired_inodes(&wb->b_dirty, &wb->b_io, older_than_this); > } > > > -- > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR