From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/PCI: initialize PCI bus node numbers early
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:45:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090914174520.7c2b37f5@jbarnes-g45> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A9D5206.5010603@kernel.org>
On Tue, 01 Sep 2009 09:55:34 -0700
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> >
> >> The current mp_bus_to_node array is initialized only by AMD
> >> specific code, since AMD platforms have registers that can be used
> >> for determining mode numbers. On new Intel platforms it's
> >> necessary to initialize this array as well though, otherwise all
> >> PCI node numbers will be 0, when in fact they should be -1
> >> (indicating that I/O isn't tied to any particular node).
> >>
> >> So move the mp_bus_to_node code into the common PCI code, and
> >> initialize it early with a default value of -1. This may be
> >> overridden later by arch code (e.g. the AMD code).
> >>
> >> With this change, PCI consistent memory and other node specific
> >> allocations (e.g. skbuff allocs) should occur on the "current"
> >> node. If, for performance reasons, applications want to be bound
> >> to specific nodes, they should open their devices only after being
> >> pinned to the CPU where they'll run, for maximum locality.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts here Yinghai or Jesse?
> >>
> >>
> >> include/asm/pci.h | 2 +
> >> kernel/setup.c | 2 +
> >> pci/amd_bus.c | 61
> >> +----------------------------------------- pci/common.c |
> >> 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files
> >> changed, 83 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> >
> > FYI, this commit:
> >
> > acccaba: x86/PCI: initialize PCI bus node numbers early
> >
> > caused a boot crash in -tip testing:
> >
>
> looks like the patch change default 0 in 32bit to -1 ...
Ingo or Yinghai, did you get a chance to try the patch I sent? Maybe
you've already integrated it...
Thanks,
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-15 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-10 17:44 Jesse Barnes
2009-07-10 18:33 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-10 20:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-07-10 20:19 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-10 20:18 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-07-10 20:22 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-10 21:06 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-07-14 7:41 ` Jesse Brandeburg
2009-07-14 15:47 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-09-01 13:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-01 16:55 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-09-01 17:09 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-09-15 0:45 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2009-09-01 22:28 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090914174520.7c2b37f5@jbarnes-g45 \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®