mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
	Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] cpu: pseries: Cpu offline states framework
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:48:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090916074848.GB4870@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090915145834.GG4846@balbir.in.ibm.com>

On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:28:34PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> [2009-09-15 14:11:41]:
> 
> > On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 17:36 +0530, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> > > This patchset contains the offline state driver implemented for
> > > pSeries. For pSeries, we define three available_hotplug_states. They are:
> > > 
> > >         online: The processor is online.
> > > 
> > >         offline: This is the the default behaviour when the cpu is offlined
> > >         even in the absense of this driver. The CPU would call make an
> > >         rtas_stop_self() call and hand over the CPU back to the resource pool,
> > >         thereby effectively deallocating that vCPU from the LPAR.
> > >         NOTE: This would result in a configuration change to the LPAR
> > >         which is visible to the outside world.
> > > 
> > >         inactive: This cedes the vCPU to the hypervisor with a cede latency
> > >         specifier value 2.
> > >         NOTE: This option does not result in a configuration change
> > >         and the vCPU would be still entitled to the LPAR to which it earlier
> > >         belong to.
> > > 
> > > Any feedback on the patchset will be immensely valuable.
> > 
> > I still think its a layering violation... its the hypervisor manager
> > that should be bothered in what state an off-lined cpu is in. 
> >
> 
> From a design standpoint where we stand today is
> 
> 1. A cede indicates that the CPU is no longer needed and can be
> reassigned (remember we do dedicated CPU partitions in power)
> 2. What this patch is trying to do is to say "We don't need the
> CPU, but please don't reassign, put it to sleep"

FWIW, this sounds exactly like the same we have already on s390.
But back then I didn't consider adding a common code infrastructure
would make sense :)

Besides the "online" attribute we have an additional "configure"
attribute to which can only be written if the cpu is offline.
Writing a "0" to it would mean that you currently won't need the cpu
anymore and the hypervisor is free to reassign the cpu to a different
LPAR.
Writing a "1" to it means you want to use it. If there are enough
resources you will get it. If not.. bad luck.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-16  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-15 12:06 Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-15 12:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] pSeries: cede latency specifier helper function Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-15 14:45   ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-15 12:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] cpu: Offline state Framework Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-30 17:31   ` Randy Dunlap
2009-09-15 12:07 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] cpu: Implement cpu-offline-state callbacks for pSeries Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-15 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] cpu: pseries: Cpu offline states framework Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-15 13:21   ` Michael Ellerman
2009-09-15 14:58   ` Balbir Singh
2009-09-16  7:48     ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2009-09-24  0:52       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-16 15:28   ` Dipankar Sarma
2009-09-16 15:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-16 16:24       ` Dipankar Sarma
2009-09-16 16:35         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-16 17:03           ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-09-16 17:22             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-16 20:17               ` Dipankar Sarma
2009-09-24  0:55         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-24  0:51   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-25 14:48     ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-25 21:12       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-28 13:53         ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-09-28 13:51       ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-09-26  9:55   ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090916074848.GB4870@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
    --to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=jschopp@austin.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®