From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] cpu: pseries: Cpu offline states framework
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:48:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090916074848.GB4870@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090915145834.GG4846@balbir.in.ibm.com>
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:28:34PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> [2009-09-15 14:11:41]:
>
> > On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 17:36 +0530, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> > > This patchset contains the offline state driver implemented for
> > > pSeries. For pSeries, we define three available_hotplug_states. They are:
> > >
> > > online: The processor is online.
> > >
> > > offline: This is the the default behaviour when the cpu is offlined
> > > even in the absense of this driver. The CPU would call make an
> > > rtas_stop_self() call and hand over the CPU back to the resource pool,
> > > thereby effectively deallocating that vCPU from the LPAR.
> > > NOTE: This would result in a configuration change to the LPAR
> > > which is visible to the outside world.
> > >
> > > inactive: This cedes the vCPU to the hypervisor with a cede latency
> > > specifier value 2.
> > > NOTE: This option does not result in a configuration change
> > > and the vCPU would be still entitled to the LPAR to which it earlier
> > > belong to.
> > >
> > > Any feedback on the patchset will be immensely valuable.
> >
> > I still think its a layering violation... its the hypervisor manager
> > that should be bothered in what state an off-lined cpu is in.
> >
>
> From a design standpoint where we stand today is
>
> 1. A cede indicates that the CPU is no longer needed and can be
> reassigned (remember we do dedicated CPU partitions in power)
> 2. What this patch is trying to do is to say "We don't need the
> CPU, but please don't reassign, put it to sleep"
FWIW, this sounds exactly like the same we have already on s390.
But back then I didn't consider adding a common code infrastructure
would make sense :)
Besides the "online" attribute we have an additional "configure"
attribute to which can only be written if the cpu is offline.
Writing a "0" to it would mean that you currently won't need the cpu
anymore and the hypervisor is free to reassign the cpu to a different
LPAR.
Writing a "1" to it means you want to use it. If there are enough
resources you will get it. If not.. bad luck.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-16 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-15 12:06 Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-15 12:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] pSeries: cede latency specifier helper function Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-15 14:45 ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-15 12:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] cpu: Offline state Framework Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-30 17:31 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-09-15 12:07 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] cpu: Implement cpu-offline-state callbacks for pSeries Gautham R Shenoy
2009-09-15 12:11 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] cpu: pseries: Cpu offline states framework Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-15 13:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-09-15 14:58 ` Balbir Singh
2009-09-16 7:48 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2009-09-24 0:52 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-16 15:28 ` Dipankar Sarma
2009-09-16 15:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-16 16:24 ` Dipankar Sarma
2009-09-16 16:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-16 17:03 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-09-16 17:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-16 20:17 ` Dipankar Sarma
2009-09-24 0:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-24 0:51 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-25 14:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-25 21:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-09-28 13:53 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-09-28 13:51 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-09-26 9:55 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090916074848.GB4870@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=djwong@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=jschopp@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®