From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fixing "pci=use_crs"
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 12:57:48 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909171257.48851.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090917094527.051ca4bc@jbarnes-g45>
On Thursday 17 September 2009 10:45:27 am Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > The extra resources in the old dmesg could be from "pci=use_crs"
> > being the default, but if that were the case, they should be in
> > the PNP resource dump. Did you update the BIOS between those
> > boots?
>
> FWIW in the CRS problem thread there were other reports of large
> numbers of PNP resources causing problems. One solution I considered
> before we ended up reverting the patch was to increase the number of
> bus resources we track. Rather than a small array of resources per
> bus, we could have a linked list, which would allow us to track an
> arbitrary number.
I think that might be a good starting point anyway, since I'm not
aware of any spec that limits the number of apertures a host bridge
can have.
> We probably want to distinguish between what we read from the hw regs
> and what's reported in PNP though, so maybe a new list in addition to
> the existing resource set would be the way to go. That would allow us
> to selectively ignore PNP resources on machines where they report bogus
> ranges (or selectively look at them, either way).
When we can read things from hardware registers, I think we have to
trust that more than anything from other sources. But I'm not proposing
any particular solution yet; I just want to get a better understanding
of what we're seeing.
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-17 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-16 23:15 Bjorn Helgaas
2009-09-17 16:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-09-17 16:45 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-09-17 18:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2009-09-19 17:08 ` Larry Finger
2009-09-21 21:20 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-09-22 23:35 ` Larry Finger
2009-09-23 23:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-09-23 23:28 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-09-24 3:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-09-24 4:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-09-24 13:24 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-09-24 22:03 ` Gary Hade
2009-09-24 15:26 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2009-09-25 21:00 ` Larry Finger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909171257.48851.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--to=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=garyhade@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®