mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix bdi_unregister() before sb kill
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:40:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090918064006.GU23126@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1253229410.2783.16.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>

On Thu, Sep 17 2009, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 21:40 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 17 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > This can cause a hang on NFS umount, since the bdi gets pruned before we
> > > flush any pending dirty IO. Peter, can you check whether it fixes your
> > > issue?
> > 
> > There's another problem with NFS && backing devices. NFS may call
> > bdi_destroy() on a bdi without ever called bdi_init(). This was always a
> > bad idea, now it's an issue.
> > 
> > So, Trond, can I safely add a server->flags private flag to indicate
> > that we have called bdi_init()? Then nfs_free_server() knows when to
> > call bdi_destroy(). Seems like the safest fix, since error handling is
> > currently 'just call nfs_free_server()'.
> 
> Urgh... Is there any reason why we can't just move the call to
> bdi_init() into nfs_bdi_register()? It seems bizarre to have to
> initialise the backing_dev_info twice like this...

No reason at all, I don't know why it was implemented that way
originally.

> If we do that, then we can just look at the BDI_registered state flag in
> order to figure out if we need to call bdi_unregister()

That's not exactly pretty either, diving into internal bdi details to
find out if we did an init/register of the device. BDI_registered is
just a debug flag, it may even go away again shortly.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-18  6:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-17 12:42 Jens Axboe
2009-09-17 19:40 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-17 19:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-17 19:48     ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-17 23:16   ` Trond Myklebust
2009-09-18  6:40     ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-09-18 15:02       ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-18 16:19         ` Trond Myklebust
2009-09-18 17:36           ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-18 18:32             ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-18 18:40               ` Trond Myklebust
2009-09-18 18:46                 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-18 20:01                   ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-18 20:05                     ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-18 20:11                       ` Trond Myklebust
2009-09-18 20:16               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-18 20:22                 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-18 20:38                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-18 20:44                     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090918064006.GU23126@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome