From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [crash] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null), last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/local_cpus
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:10:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090918101005.6e1ae14e@jbarnes-g45> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0909180949420.4950@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 09:51:01 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >
> > exposed by Jesse's patch too.
> >
> > please check
> >
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h | 9 ++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> > +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/pci.h
> > @@ -143,7 +143,14 @@ static inline int __pcibus_to_node(const
> > static inline const struct cpumask *
> > cpumask_of_pcibus(const struct pci_bus *bus)
> > {
> > - return cpumask_of_node(__pcibus_to_node(bus));
> > + int node;
> > +
> > + node = __pcibus_to_node(bus);
> > +
> > + if (node == -1)
> > + node = numa_node_id();
> > +
> > + return cpumask_of_node(node);
>
> This looks like the wrong fix. Why would the pcibus cpumask depend on
> the node we happen to run on right now? All the other code says "no
> node means all online cpus", which makes much more sense.
Yeah, the fix I applied has the latter logic.
--
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-18 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-15 20:21 [git pull] first round of PCI updates for 2.6.32 Jesse Barnes
2009-09-16 14:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-16 15:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-09-17 17:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-17 17:36 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-09-17 17:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-17 18:46 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-09-18 7:59 ` [crash] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null), last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/local_cpus Ingo Molnar
2009-09-18 9:37 ` David Rientjes
2009-09-18 15:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-18 15:44 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-09-24 8:18 ` Rusty Russell
2009-09-24 12:18 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: Remove redundant non-NUMA topology functions tip-bot for Rusty Russell
2009-09-18 16:24 ` [crash] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null), last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/local_cpus Yinghai Lu
2009-09-18 16:34 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-09-18 16:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-18 17:10 ` Jesse Barnes [this message]
2009-09-18 15:27 ` [git pull] first round of PCI updates for 2.6.32 Jesse Barnes
2009-09-18 15:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-09-18 16:17 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-09-17 17:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-09-17 18:31 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090918101005.6e1ae14e@jbarnes-g45 \
--to=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome