From: Thomas Fjellstrom <tfjellstrom@shaw.ca>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Poor desktop responsiveness with background I/O-operations
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:11:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909192211.17381.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AB59CBB.8090907@datenparkplatz.de>
On Sat September 19 2009, Ulrich Lukas wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> using a recent hard-/software setup, I observed that continuous
> read/write operations severely degrade the overall system responsiveness
> in typical desktop-PC use cases.
>
> Merely doing write/read operations on a data volume leads to stuck text
> and mouse cursors, seconds-long delays for simple window-context
> switches in X11, dropouts in low-resolution video playback etc.
>
>
>
> Test case:
> - 64-bit dual-core PC, SATA harddrive, plenty of free RAM
> - vanilla Linux 2.6.31, Kubuntu 9.10 packages, all software 64-bit
>
>
> How to reproduce:
> - start KDE/GNOME-session
> - open a terminal window and do as a non-root user:
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/home/john-doe/testfile
> (or dd if=/home/john-doe/big-testfile of=/dev/null)
>
> - a real use scenario would be a daily disk-backup or the
> simple extraction of a tarball containing slightly bigger files
>
>
> Observation:
> - The system becomes _really_ slow as described above; unusable for
> any multimedia tasks.
>
> - Using an encrypted (dm-crypt/LUKS) /home (e.g. on mobile computers)
> compounds the issue to a painful extent.
>
>
>
> Possible culprits (I'm guessing) are the Linux I/O- or CPU scheduler.
>
> I realize that a single heavyweight transfer slows down I/O for the
> corresponding transactions/processes/volumes etc.
>
> But there needs to be a fair distribution of I/O or CPU time which
> leaves enough for other basic operations. And this doesn't seem to be
> the case with recent Linux versions.
>
>
>
>
> On a side note, I've tried the BFS-patches (bfs-221 on 2.6.31): This
> yields significantly higher throughput when using disk encryption (50%
> improvement with dm-crypt/LUKS, 512 bit aes-xts-plain cipher mode). But
> with these patches, the responsiveness was even worse during my quick
> test. Switching to a text-mode console: several /minutes/ delay...
>
>
> I'm attaching my .config for linux 2.6.31 (grep ^C and bzip2-ed)
>
I've seen similar things with my Intel p35 (q6600) system, especially under
64bit. Heavy i/o makes the rest of the system perform very badly. I have
however not noticed nearly as much of a problem with my AMD (SB700&SB750)
systems.
--
Thomas Fjellstrom
tfjellstrom@shaw.ca
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-20 4:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-20 3:08 Ulrich Lukas
2009-09-20 4:11 ` Thomas Fjellstrom [this message]
2009-09-20 6:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-20 8:50 ` Ulrich Lukas
2009-09-20 17:17 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-09-20 19:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-21 0:22 ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-09-21 4:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-21 7:48 ` Ulrich Lukas
2009-09-21 8:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-21 19:47 ` James Cloos
2009-09-21 22:47 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-09-21 23:34 ` James Cloos
2009-09-22 7:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-22 9:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-22 11:22 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-09-22 11:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-22 16:58 ` James Cloos
2009-09-20 17:04 ` Ulrich Lukas
2009-09-20 20:22 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-09-20 22:04 ` Jan Kara
2009-09-21 7:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-21 7:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-21 7:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-21 7:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-09-21 2:59 ` Ulrich Lukas
[not found] <dmlhK-6ws-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <dmnMy-8tg-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2009-09-20 18:51 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200909192211.17381.tfjellstrom@shaw.ca \
--to=tfjellstrom@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®