From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754197AbZIURKF (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:10:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750977AbZIURKD (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:10:03 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:51327 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750822AbZIURKD (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:10:03 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:10:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20090921.101021.193734103.davem@davemloft.net> To: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl Cc: mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] perf vs d-cache aliasses From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20090921140848.444528343@chello.nl> References: <20090921140848.444528343@chello.nl> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:08:48 +0200 > > based on your vmalloc code, an alternative implementation that lets x86 stay > with regular allocations. > > While I'm sad to have to propose having two implementations around, I see no > other way to please both sides. If you guys want to maintain two implementations of the same thing, that's fine with me :)