From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751981AbZIWKv6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:51:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751732AbZIWKv5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:51:57 -0400 Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.236]:52263 "EHLO pfepb.post.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751555AbZIWKv5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:51:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 12:51:57 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Amerigo Wang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [RFC Patch] kbuild: remove -Wdeclaration-after-statement Message-ID: <20090923105157.GA31281@merkur.ravnborg.org> References: <20090923094034.23512.90809.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090923094034.23512.90809.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 05:38:01AM -0400, Amerigo Wang wrote: > > I got lots of "ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code" warnings > during compile today's kernel. > > I think we can remove the gcc option '-Wdeclaration-after-statement' > now, since we already have C99 for 10 years. :) This is a matter of style more than what C99 allows. Kernel style is to fobid this(*) so we keep the warning. (*) Based on reading several threads where this has been mentioned - I have no specific references to CodingStyle. Sam