mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	mingo@elte.hu, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] Add explicit bound checks in mm/migrate.c
Date: Thu,  1 Oct 2009 14:54:59 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091001144858.5F31.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090930152011.18c2cf82.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Hi

> On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:54:06 +0200
> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> > From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH 8/9] Add explicit bound checks in mm/migrate.c
> > CC: akpm@linux-foundation.org
> > 
> > The memory migration code has some curious copy_from_user bounds,
> > that are likely ok, but are not immediately obvious to me or to GCC.
> > 
> > This patch adds a simple explicit bound check; this allows GCC
> > and me to be more assured that the copy_from_user will never overwrite
> > its destination buffer.
> 
> I don't really see what's being fixed here.  The original code seems
> straightforward and safe enough?

I think original code is safe too.

> The identifier `chunk_nr' is a bit ambiguous.  Is it "number of chunks" or
> is it "index of this chunk"?

chunk_nr is batch size. (ie it's number of chunks)


Plus, I have a review comment.

> 
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> > index 1a4bf48..5b9ebc5 100644
> > --- a/mm/migrate.c
> > +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> > @@ -1044,11 +1044,15 @@ static int do_pages_stat(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long nr_pages,
> >  	int err;
> >  
> >  	for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i += chunk_nr) {
> > +		unsigned int copy;
> >  		if (chunk_nr + i > nr_pages)
> >  			chunk_nr = nr_pages - i;
> 
> A newline after end-of-locals is conventional.
> 
> `i' and `chunk_nr' have type `unsigned long' and you're mixing that up
> with `unsigned int'.
> 
> > -		err = copy_from_user(chunk_pages, &pages[i],
> > -				     chunk_nr * sizeof(*chunk_pages));
> 
> And we mix it up with size_t as well.
> 
> The type choices are a bit confused and sloppy.  Converting it all to
> `unsigned int' should be OK.
> 
> > +		copy = chunk_nr * sizeof(*chunk_pages);
> > +		if (copy > DO_PAGES_STAT_CHUNK_NR)
> > +			return -EFAULT;

this seems a bit strange. 
the unit of copy is byte. but the unit of DO_PAGES_STAT_CHUNK_NR is
not byte.



> > +
> > +		err = copy_from_user(chunk_pages, &pages[i], copy);
> >  		if (err) {
> >  			err = -EFAULT;
> >  			goto out;
> 
> 




  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-01  5:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-26 18:49 [PATCH 0/9] Series to make copy_from_user to a stack slot provable right Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 18:50 ` [PATCH 1/9] Fix bound checks for copy_from_user in the acpi /proc code Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 18:50 ` [PATCH 2/9] Simplify bound checks in nvram for copy_from_user Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 18:51 ` [PATCH 3/9] Add bound checks in wext " Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 18:51 ` [PATCH 4/9] Simplify bound checks in the MTRR code Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-02 18:36   ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86: " tip-bot for Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 18:52 ` [PATCH 5/9] Add bound checks in acpi/video for copy_from_user Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 18:52 ` [PATCH 6/9] Simplify bound checks in cifs " Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 18:53 ` [PATCH 7/9] Simplify bound checks in capabilities " Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-29  5:55   ` Dave Airlie
2009-09-29  9:24     ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-10-01 22:34       ` James Morris
2009-09-26 18:54 ` [PATCH 8/9] Add explicit bound checks in mm/migrate.c Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-30 22:20   ` Andrew Morton
2009-10-01  5:54     ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
     [not found]   ` <tip-b925585039cf39275c2e0e57512e5df27fa73aad@git.kernel.org>
2009-12-13 23:38     ` [tip:x86/urgent] mm: Adjust do_pages_stat() so gcc can see copy_from_user() is safe KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-09-26 18:54 ` [PATCH 9/9] Add explicit bound checks in net/socket.c Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 19:01   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-09-26 19:05     ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 19:23     ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-09-26 19:35       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-09-28 19:57       ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091001144858.5F31.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®