From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
tglx@linutronix.de,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: T400 suspend/resume regression -- bisected to a mystery merge commit
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:02:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091002100218.7c4eb8b8@mschwide.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0910011817120.6996@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Theodore Tso wrote:
> >
> > commit 8c3ee48dabee782d470cc4c7048ea64bb8b7d1cb
> > Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> > Date: Thu Oct 1 20:39:03 2009 -0400
> >
> > Revert "timekeeping: Update clocksource with stop_machine"
> >
> > This reverts commit 75c5158f70c065b9704b924503d96e8297838f79.
>
> Hmm. Looks good. But you didn't cc most of the people actually involved
> with that commit (Martin who is the author, and John who acked it).
>
> I think the revert is the right thing to do, especially as that
> 'clocksource_mutex' looks totally bogus. Either the thing is protected by
> 'stop_machine' or it's not. In neither case does it seem to make any sense
> to replace a spinlock with a mutex.
>
> And resuming anything with a big mutex is crazy anyway.
>
> That said, I do wonder if this is already fixed. See commit
> 89133f93508137231251543d1732da638e6022e1:
>
> clocksource: Resume clocksource without taking the clocksource mutex
>
> which already undid the part that probably mattered for you. That said, I
> still do think that that mutex is dubious, so maybe we should undo it all.
It whole clocksource rework started with the wish to get rid of the
change_clocksource call in update_wall_time. That call is unnecessary
in 99.9% of all cases as the clocksource does not change all the time.
In order to do that the new clocksource is activated with stop_machine.
Now if you use stop_machine you can not hold any spinlock which made
it necessary to convert the clocksource spinlock to a mutex. And we
need something to protect against concurrent clocksource changes, e.g.
one clocksource_register vs a clocksource_change_rating triggered by
the watchdog. The only other solution would be to split the clocksource
change, part 1) detection that a clocksource change is needed, part 2)
stop_machine does the clocksource selection. Right now the clocksource
to use is identified prior to the stop_machine call.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-02 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-26 6:57 Theodore Ts'o
2009-09-26 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-09-27 8:08 ` Len Brown
2009-09-27 16:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-09-28 13:51 ` Theodore Tso
2009-09-28 21:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-02 0:59 ` Theodore Tso
2009-10-02 1:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-10-02 8:02 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2009-10-02 22:34 ` Theodore Tso
2009-10-02 6:50 ` Magnus Damm
2009-10-02 17:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091002100218.7c4eb8b8@mschwide.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rainbow-software.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®