From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933760AbZJFWyH (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:54:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756887AbZJFWyF (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:54:05 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f210.google.com ([209.85.218.210]:54109 "EHLO mail-bw0-f210.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933417AbZJFWyE (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Oct 2009 18:54:04 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=ju+IKiJ1NuLCWSPD3JVCMgDU9w9UzJBHi2Ybixm6fx7fbY5TqRuoZaXeYYMt9w2jsS pxoxQ3vuKzLq4HPMCH8iXIcVKp33UrnhiCo9pT8bnXZBrGEWlZdM8VRIz3x7pham2rBV 3OMTzVoEh5ZIQemSMpAXc9KQtexKuCfve+FdY= From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz To: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "Revert "ide: try to use PIO Mode 0 during probe if possible"" Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:52:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.31.1-56.fc12.x86_64; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, joao.ramos@inov.pt, david@fries.net, d.stussy@yahoo.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200910070027.45678.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20091006.154120.153174904.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20091006.154120.153174904.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200910070052.37964.bzolnier@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 07 October 2009 00:41:20 David Miller wrote: > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:27:45 +0200 > > > The root cause of reported system hangs was (now fixed) sis5513 bug > > and not "ide: try to use PIO Mode 0 during probe if possible" change > > (commit 6029336426a2b43e4bc6f4a84be8789a047d139e) so the revert was > > incorrect (it simply replaced one regression with the other one). > > What is this older "regression" fixed by the PIO-0 change? > > You're not explaining it and neither does the commit message for the > PIO-0 change. It does: | Subject: [PATCH] sis5513: fix PIO setup for ATAPI devices | | Clear prefetch setting before potentially (re-)enabling it in | config_drive_art_rwp() so the transition of the device type on | the port from ATA to ATAPI (i.e. during warm-plug operation) | is handled correctly. and the empty port defaults to ATA-like behavior for the initial PIO setup. > Please, fill us in :-) Just connect the dots.. :)