From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760458AbZJIJS0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Oct 2009 05:18:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760290AbZJIJSZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Oct 2009 05:18:25 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:48156 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758148AbZJIJSY (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Oct 2009 05:18:24 -0400 Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 02:18:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20091009.021820.62532131.davem@davemloft.net> To: mb@bu3sch.de Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 2009-10-08 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <200910091057.21269.mb@bu3sch.de> References: <200910090108.08838.mb@bu3sch.de> <20091008.180119.242402327.davem@davemloft.net> <200910091057.21269.mb@bu3sch.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Michael Buesch Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 10:57:19 +0200 > What's a maintainer good for, if it's not for maintaining the code > quality? It does not mean you get total control over anything, ever. That's my main point. Every maintainer who loses his mind when some change goes in he doesn't like has a serious control problem. And yes, sometimes that includes me.