From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1758983AbZJMGzc@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758983AbZJMGzc (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:55:32 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756932AbZJMGzb
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:55:31 -0400
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:45911
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756226AbZJMGzb (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:55:31 -0400
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20091012.235526.136038699.davem@davemloft.net>
To: webmail.hce@gmail.com
Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: support TOE
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In-Reply-To: <95455e980910122337y9e1186ft90cb78204bdd671c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <95455e980910090412i32f401abmf4cc901be2e9acc8@mail.gmail.com>
	<20091009141538.GA22861@tuxdriver.com>
	<95455e980910122337y9e1186ft90cb78204bdd671c@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

From: hce <webmail.hce@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:37:22 +1100

> Nice article, but it does not mention if the current kernel supports
> TOE or not.

Why would we support something we say sucks and is pointless?

We don't support it and hopefully we never will.