mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: david@lang.hm
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: removing existing working drivers via staging
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 21:16:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091015191641.GB19467@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0910151200100.22169@asgard.lang.hm>


* david@lang.hm <david@lang.hm> wrote:

>> But a driver in staging still has to be able to build, api changes 
>> are not able to be ignored in it.
>
> a driver in staging will be able to build, but a driver that was 
> removed after 6-9 months that a user discovered the removal of a year 
> later when they upgraded to a new distro release (say a normal ubuntu 
> release after staying on the old one for the 18 month support period) 
> is likely to need significant work to catch up with kernel changes in 
> the meanwhile.

Where do you get the 6-9 months from? Greg said he'll wait 3 kernel 
releases. Here's the timeline of that:

 - release x
 - [A] driver moves into drivers/staging/ in the staging tree
 - release x+1
 - drivers/staging/ change gets merged in the x+2 merge window
 - release x+2 - first kernel with the driver in staging
 - release x+3
 - release x+4
 - driver gets removed in the staging tree
 - release x+5 - 3 kernel releases passed - now it's removed
 - removal propagates upstream in the x+6 merge window
 - [B] release x+6

from the decision to move it into staging there's 4 kernel releases 
during which the information is known, and 3 full kernel releases with 
the driver is actually moved, and even in the 4th cycle there's still 3 
months to undo the removal if there's objections (i.e. it's a 
regression).

This means the timeline is 4*3 = 12 months _at minimum_. In practice it 
will be more than a year - up to 1.5 years. Well within most distros ~3 
months upstream kernel update schedule.

And if a distro does not follow the upstream kernel ... that's a self 
inflicted wound and a distro problem really.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-15 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-15  5:27 david
2009-10-15 16:33 ` Stefan Richter
2009-10-15 16:39   ` david
2009-10-15 16:47     ` Greg KH
2009-10-15 17:42       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-15 17:49         ` Greg KH
2009-10-15 18:20           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-15 18:46             ` Greg KH
2009-10-15 18:58               ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-10-15 19:02               ` david
2009-10-15 19:16                 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-10-15 19:38                   ` david
2009-10-15 19:47                     ` Stefan Richter
2009-10-15 19:57                       ` david
2009-10-27  4:23                         ` david
2009-10-27  5:22                           ` David Miller
2009-10-27  5:50                             ` david
2009-10-27 14:06                               ` Greg KH
2009-10-27 10:45                           ` Alan Cox
2009-10-16  7:40                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-16  7:58                       ` Justin P. Mattock
2009-10-15 19:40                 ` Stefan Richter
2009-10-15 19:49                   ` david
2009-10-15 20:56                     ` Greg KH
2009-10-16  7:25                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-15 18:44         ` Alan Cox
2009-10-15 19:24         ` David Miller
2009-10-17 17:27       ` Pavel Machek
2009-10-19  7:32         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-10-19  7:40           ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091015191641.GB19467@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®