From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755421AbZJRWdE (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:33:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754774AbZJRWdE (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:33:04 -0400 Received: from foo.birdnet.se ([213.88.146.6]:50418 "HELO foo.birdnet.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754231AbZJRWdD (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:33:03 -0400 Message-ID: <20091018223306.17571.qmail@stuge.se> Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:33:06 +0200 From: Peter Stuge To: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Adding an ioctl or three Mail-Followup-To: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20091015205803.30544.qmail@stuge.se> <20091015223137.6b9fb55a@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20091015214642.6208.qmail@stuge.se> <20091015230853.44fb10c1@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20091018162737.18611.qmail@stuge.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091018162737.18611.qmail@stuge.se> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Peter Stuge wrote: > Is patching Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt and > asm/ioctls.h all? I added an ioctl into a header of my own. It works fine, but.. > The "addressing" in ioctl-number seems a little chaotic, do I just > pick anything that is available? Documentation/ioctl/ioctl-number.txt seems out of date. I picked a number that was used (by linux/toshiba.h) but not listed. Do I have to grep it out? //Peter