mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: hancockrwd@gmail.com
Cc: phdm@macqel.be, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ide] : Increase WAIT_DRQ to support slow CF cards
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:43:18 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091026.184318.205708741.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51f3faa70910261840v16444067uc323de7129b7592f@mail.gmail.com>

From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:40:03 -0600

> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:19 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>> Meanwhile we should provide a way for things to work, and
>> realistically the only way to do that currently is to bump the
>> WAIT_DRQ value to some large number.
>>
>> And that's exactly the kind of patch I'm willing to accept for this.
> 
> I agree, it's sub-optimal but it helps.. if the user wants better
> behavior they should a) fix it so that the card isn't using PIO, at
> least if it supports DMA and b) not use drivers/ide..

Philippe's patch that started this thread uses "3 * HZ / 10"
which isn't large enough for the SSD cases.  Can someone please
post a patch that uses a large enough value?

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-27  1:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-26 16:20 Philippe De Muyter
2009-10-27  0:34 ` Robert Hancock
2009-10-27  0:45   ` David Miller
2009-10-27  1:07     ` Robert Hancock
2009-10-27  1:19       ` David Miller
2009-10-27  1:40         ` Robert Hancock
2009-10-27  1:43           ` David Miller [this message]
2009-10-27  9:45             ` Philippe De Muyter
2009-10-27 10:24               ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-10-31 13:56   ` Mark Lord
2009-12-03  5:57     ` David Miller
2009-12-03  8:55       ` Philippe De Muyter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091026.184318.205708741.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=phdm@macqel.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®