From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754687AbZKBKIi (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2009 05:08:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754363AbZKBKIh (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2009 05:08:37 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:41468 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754286AbZKBKIe (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2009 05:08:34 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 11:07:35 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Avi Kivity Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Tejun Heo , Rusty Russell , Christoph Lameter , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: linux-next: percpu/kvm/tip tree build failure Message-ID: <20091102100735.GB16963@elte.hu> References: <20091102161722.eea4358d.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4AEEAA82.8070705@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AEEAA82.8070705@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-ELTE-SpamScore: 0.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=0.0 required=5.9 tests=none autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 _SUMMARY_ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Avi Kivity wrote: > On 11/02/2009 07:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: >> >> kernel/user-return-notifier.c: In function 'fire_user_return_notifiers': >> kernel/user-return-notifier.c:45: error: expected expression before ')' token >> >> Introduced by commit 7c68af6e32c73992bad24107311f3433c89016e2 ("core, >> x86: Add user return notifiers") from the tip and kvm trees but revealed >> by commit e0fdb0e050eae331046385643618f12452aa7e73 ("percpu: add __percpu >> for sparse") from the percpu tree. Before that percpu tree commit, >> "put_cpu_var()" would compile without error (even though it really needs >> a parameter). >> >> I have applied the following patch for today. >> > > Ingo, can you queue this on x86/entry? Already done, tested and pushed out. Ingo