From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753854AbZKCNoh (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:44:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753803AbZKCNog (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:44:36 -0500 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:51100 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751780AbZKCNog (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 08:44:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:44:38 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: "alsa-devel@alsa-project.org" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "sameo@linux.intel.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "tony@atomide.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] MFD: twl4030-codec: APLL_INFREQ handling in the MFD driver Message-ID: <20091103134437.GA22501@sirena.org.uk> References: <1257165295-9352-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> <1257165295-9352-4-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> <20091102173035.GC8546@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> <200911031537.50430.peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200911031537.50430.peter.ujfalusi@nokia.com> X-Cookie: I've got a bad feeling about this. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > on board. Another reason is that we have other part of the twl, which needs > resources from the codec part, but it is not loaded through the codec MFD, so > providing the needed information is kind of tricky with that setup. I had thought that the sub-device was supposed to handle the arbitration and could be used here. But like we said, it's not going to make any difference in the grand scheme of things.