From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@novell.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org
Subject: [PATCH, v3] x86: Adjust GFP mask handling for coherent allocations
Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 12:12:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091108111214.GK11372@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5hocnfu0ct.wl%tiwai@suse.de>
* Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote:
> At Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:28:39 +0000,
> Jan Beulich wrote:
> >
> > Rather than forcing GFP flags and DMA mask to be inconsistent, GFP
> > flags should be determined even for the fallback device through
> > dma_alloc_coherent_mask()/dma_alloc_coherent_gfp_flags(). This
> > restores 64-bit behavior as it was prior to commits
> > 8965eb19386fdf5ccd0ef8b02593eb8560aa3416 and
> > 4a367f3a9dbf2e7ffcee4702203479809236ee6e (not sure why there are two of
> > them), where GFP_DMA was forced on for 32-bit, but not for 64-bit, with
> > the slight adjustment that afaict even 32-bit doesn't need this without
> > CONFIG_ISA.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
> > Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
>
> Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Jesse, mind picking this up for .32?
I've attached below a slightly cleaned up version of the patch, with
Takashi's ack added.
Thanks,
Ingo
------------------>
Subject: x86: Adjust GFP mask handling for coherent allocations
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@novell.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:28:39 +0000
Rather than forcing GFP flags and DMA mask to be inconsistent,
GFP flags should be determined even for the fallback device
through dma_alloc_coherent_mask()/dma_alloc_coherent_gfp_flags().
This restores 64-bit behavior as it was prior to commits
8965eb19386fdf5ccd0ef8b02593eb8560aa3416 and
4a367f3a9dbf2e7ffcee4702203479809236ee6e (not sure why there are
two of them), where GFP_DMA was forced on for 32-bit, but not
for 64-bit, with the slight adjustment that afaict even 32-bit
doesn't need this without CONFIG_ISA.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
LKML-Reference: <4AF18187020000780001D8AA@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 10 +++++++---
arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c | 6 ++----
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: tip/arch/x86/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
+++ tip/arch/x86/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
@@ -14,6 +14,12 @@
#include <asm/swiotlb.h>
#include <asm-generic/dma-coherent.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_ISA
+# define ISA_DMA_BIT_MASK DMA_BIT_MASK(24)
+#else
+# define ISA_DMA_BIT_MASK DMA_BIT_MASK(32)
+#endif
+
extern dma_addr_t bad_dma_address;
extern int iommu_merge;
extern struct device x86_dma_fallback_dev;
@@ -124,10 +130,8 @@ dma_alloc_coherent(struct device *dev, s
if (dma_alloc_from_coherent(dev, size, dma_handle, &memory))
return memory;
- if (!dev) {
+ if (!dev)
dev = &x86_dma_fallback_dev;
- gfp |= GFP_DMA;
- }
if (!is_device_dma_capable(dev))
return NULL;
Index: tip/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
+++ tip/arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c
@@ -45,12 +45,10 @@ int iommu_pass_through __read_mostly;
dma_addr_t bad_dma_address __read_mostly = 0;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(bad_dma_address);
-/* Dummy device used for NULL arguments (normally ISA). Better would
- be probably a smaller DMA mask, but this is bug-to-bug compatible
- to older i386. */
+/* Dummy device used for NULL arguments (normally ISA). */
struct device x86_dma_fallback_dev = {
.init_name = "fallback device",
- .coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
+ .coherent_dma_mask = ISA_DMA_BIT_MASK,
.dma_mask = &x86_dma_fallback_dev.coherent_dma_mask,
};
EXPORT_SYMBOL(x86_dma_fallback_dev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-08 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-04 12:28 [PATCH] x86: adjust GFP mask handling for coherent allocations (take 2) Jan Beulich
2009-11-06 15:41 ` Takashi Iwai
2009-11-08 11:12 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-11-08 15:45 ` [PATCH, v3] x86: Adjust GFP mask handling for coherent allocations Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091108111214.GK11372@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=JBeulich@novell.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®