From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756816AbZKKEky (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:40:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756757AbZKKEkx (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:40:53 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:34065 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756755AbZKKEkw (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:40:52 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:41:18 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20091110.204118.12070030.davem@davemloft.net> To: arnd@arndb.de Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH, WTF] atm: move all compat_ioctl handling to atm/ioctl.c From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <200911061500.01651.arnd@arndb.de> References: <200911061500.01651.arnd@arndb.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I agree that this should be done in one place, rather than split up like it is now. Can you please respin your changes against net-next-2.6 since the code you are changing here is no longer in fs/compat_ioctl.c due to your other patch set? Thanks.