mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@holoscopio.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, device@lanana.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, rubini@gnudd.com, gregkh@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] misc: use a proper range for minor number dynamic allocation
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:45:37 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091110164536.GA3628@vespa.holoscopio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF8B4FF.9050405@zytor.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1882 bytes --]

On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 04:34:07PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/09/2009 04:30 PM, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > The current dynamic allocation of minor number for misc devices has some
> > drawbacks.
> > 
> > First of all, the range for dynamic numbers include some statically
> > allocated numbers. It goes from 63 to 0, and we have numbers in the
> > range from 1 to 15 already allocated. Although, it gives priority to the
> > higher and not allocated numbers, we may end up in a situation where we
> > must reject registering a driver which got a static number because a
> > driver got its number with dynamic allocation. Considering fs/dlm/user.c
> > allocates as many misc devices as lockspaces are created, and that we
> > have more than 50 users around, it's not unreasonable to reach that
> > situation.
> > 
> > The proposed solution uses the not yet reserved range from 64 to 127. If
> > more devices are needed, we may push 64 to 16.
> > 
> 
> Again, why not push these up above 256?
> 
> 	-hpa

I don't have a problem with this. However, as Alan has pointed out,
there may be old setups that rely on minor numbers below 256. I have
thought of that, but I'm sure there's argument against it. I've decided
to submit it more closely to what is done today, that is, 64 devices. As
I said, there's still space for 48 more devices, and, besides DLM, I
couldn't find at first glance any other user that requests more than one
single device.

Anyway, the only thing that worries me when pushing it above 256 is
that, right now, the bitmap is statically allocated, and I think a
single page would be pretty more than we have and we need right now.
Otherwise, I would suggest using a dynamic allocation system, which
would be less simple than what we have right now, and Andrew has pointed
out.

Best Regards,
Cascardo.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-10 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-10  0:30 [PATCH 1/3] misc: clear allocation bit in minor bitmap when device register fails Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2009-11-10  0:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] misc: use bitmap/bitops functions for dynamic minor number allocation Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2009-11-10  0:30   ` [PATCH 3/3] misc: use a proper range for minor number dynamic allocation Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2009-11-10  0:34     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-10 10:19       ` Alan Cox
2009-11-10 16:45       ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo [this message]
2009-11-11 23:36       ` Andrew Morton
2009-12-15 22:34         ` Andrew Morton
2009-12-15 22:42           ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-12-15 22:56             ` Greg KH
2009-12-15 23:56               ` Alan Cox
2009-12-16 23:14                 ` cascardo
2009-12-16 22:51             ` cascardo
2009-12-15 23:37           ` Alan Cox
2009-12-15 23:41             ` Andrew Morton
2009-12-16 18:01             ` David Teigland
2009-12-16 17:10               ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-12-16 23:21               ` cascardo
2009-12-16 23:05             ` cascardo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091110164536.GA3628@vespa.holoscopio.com \
    --to=cascardo@holoscopio.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=device@lanana.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rubini@gnudd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®