From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Subject: [BUG] sched_rt_periodic_timer vs cpu hotplug
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 11:18:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091111101801.GA19103@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi all,
we've seen a crash on s390 which seems to be related to sched_rt_period_timer vs.
cpu hotplug:
<1>Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference at virtual kernel address 00000000ff5ec000
<4>Oops: 0011 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
<4>Modules linked in: sunrpc qeth_l2 dm_multipath dm_mod chsc_sch qeth ccwgroup
<4>CPU: 9 Not tainted 2.6.31-39.x.20090916-s390xdefault #1
<4>Process swapper (pid: 0, task: 00000000ffc8ca40, ksp: 00000000ffc93d48)
<4>Krnl PSW : 0404200180000000 000000000013952c (sched_rt_period_timer+0x188/0x3d8)
<4> R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:0 CC:2 PM:0 EA:3
<4>Krnl GPRS: ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffff80 00000000ff5ec000 0000000000000008
<4> 0000000000000000 0000000000000040 0000000000000001 0000000000a7db58
<4> 0000000087139db8 0000000087da6500 0000000000000000 0000000000000007
<4> 00000000ff5ec008 0000000000598cc8 00000000001394d0 00000000ff7b7968
<4>Krnl Code: 000000000013951c: a709ffff lghi %r0,-1
<4> 0000000000139520: eb102000000d sllg %r1,%r0,0(%r2)
<4> 0000000000139526: e320f0b80004 lg %r2,184(%r15)
<4> >000000000013952c: e31320000080 ng %r1,0(%r3,%r2)
<4> 0000000000139532: 1211 ltr %r1,%r1
<4> 0000000000139534: a78400ff brc 8,139732
<4> 0000000000139538: a7290000 lghi %r2,0
<4> 000000000013953c: a711ffff tmll %r1,65535
<4>Call Trace:
<4>([<00000000001394d0>] sched_rt_period_timer+0x12c/0x3d8)
<4> [<0000000000173db0>] __run_hrtimer+0xb0/0x110
<4> [<00000000001740b2>] hrtimer_interrupt+0xf2/0x1e8
<4> [<000000000010770c>] clock_comparator_work+0x68/0x70
<4> [<000000000010dbc0>] do_extint+0x18c/0x190
<4> [<0000000000117f9e>] ext_no_vtime+0x1e/0x22
<4> [<000000000058ea04>] _spin_unlock_irq+0x48/0x80
<4>([<000000000058ea00>] _spin_unlock_irq+0x44/0x80)
<4> [<000000000043c190>] dasd_block_tasklet+0x1b8/0x2b0
<4> [<0000000000155b0e>] tasklet_hi_action+0xfe/0x1f4
<4> [<00000000001570d4>] __do_softirq+0x184/0x2e8
<4> [<0000000000110b34>] do_softirq+0xe4/0xe8
<4> [<0000000000156ac4>] irq_exit+0xc0/0xe0
<4> [<000000000010db7a>] do_extint+0x146/0x190
<4> [<0000000000117f9e>] ext_no_vtime+0x1e/0x22
<4> [<0000000000115040>] vtime_stop_cpu+0xac/0x100
<4>([<0000000000114fe6>] vtime_stop_cpu+0x52/0x100)
<4> [<000000000010a324>] cpu_idle+0xfc/0x198
<4> [<0000000000584a64>] start_secondary+0xb4/0xc0
sched_rt_period_timer tried to access a memory region which was unmapped from
the kernel 1:1 mapping. So we seem to have a use-after-free bug.
The C code snippet in question, which seems to cause the addressing exception is:
static int do_sched_rt_period_timer(struct rt_bandwidth *rt_b, int overrun)
{
int i, idle = 1;
const struct cpumask *span;
if (!rt_bandwidth_enabled() || rt_b->rt_runtime == RUNTIME_INF)
return 1;
span = sched_rt_period_mask();
for_each_cpu(i, span) { <------ read access to root_domain of runqueue
int enqueue = 0;
...
with
static inline const struct cpumask *sched_rt_period_mask(void)
{
return cpu_rq(smp_processor_id())->rd->span;
}
The read access to the span cpumask within the root_domain caused the exception.
Now since DEBUG_PAGEALLOC is turned on we can easily see who freed the piece of
memory since it contains a backtrace:
0x13caca <cpu_attach_domain+482>
0x1418fe <partition_sched_domains+350>
0x141d90 <update_sched_domains+100>
0x5915a6 <notifier_call_chain+150>
0x17666c <raw_notifier_call_chain+44>
0x585b74 <_cpu_up+436>
0x585c3a <cpu_up+186>
0x58336a <store_online+146>
0x29cfa4 <sysfs_write_file+248>
0x228b60 <SyS_write>
cpu_attach_domain calls (inlined) rq_attach_root. That function replaces a
runqueue's root_domain while holding its lock (&rq->lock).
Now the code snippet above from do_sched_rt_period_timer does access a
runqueue's root_domain _without_ holding its lock.
That way a concurrent cpu_up operation can easily change a runqueue's
root_domain pointer while it is still in use. Which is what happened here.
Just grabbing and releasing the lock for each iteration is probably not the
real fix, since the span mask could change between iterations. Which might
lead to strange effects.
next reply other threads:[~2009-11-11 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-11 10:18 Heiko Carstens [this message]
2009-11-11 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-11 12:27 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-11-16 9:05 ` Heiko Carstens
2009-11-16 9:31 ` [PATCH] sched: " Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-16 11:18 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: Sched_rt_periodic_timer " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091111101801.GA19103@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com \
--to=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome