From: Yasunori Goto <y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [BUG] cpu controller can't provide fair CPU time for each group
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:12:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091112095947.7229.E1E9C6FF@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1257934048.23203.76.camel@twins>
> On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 15:21 +0900, Yasunori Goto wrote:
> > > Someone needs to fix that if they really care.
> >
> > To be honest, I don't have any good idea because I'm not familiar with
> > schduler's code.
>
> You could possible try something like the below, its rather gross but
> might maybe work,.. has other issues though.
Thank you very much for your patch. I'm very glad.
Unfortunately, my test staff and I don't have test box today,
I'll report the result later.
Thanks again for your time.
>
>
> ---
> kernel/sched.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 91642c1..65629a3 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -1614,7 +1614,7 @@ static void update_group_shares_cpu(struct task_group *tg, int cpu,
> */
> static int tg_shares_up(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
> {
> - unsigned long weight, rq_weight = 0, shares = 0;
> + unsigned long weight, rq_weight = 0, sum_weight = 0, shares = 0;
> unsigned long *usd_rq_weight;
> struct sched_domain *sd = data;
> unsigned long flags;
> @@ -1630,6 +1630,7 @@ static int tg_shares_up(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
> weight = tg->cfs_rq[i]->load.weight;
> usd_rq_weight[i] = weight;
>
> + rq_weight += weight;
> /*
> * If there are currently no tasks on the cpu pretend there
> * is one of average load so that when a new task gets to
> @@ -1638,10 +1639,14 @@ static int tg_shares_up(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
> if (!weight)
> weight = NICE_0_LOAD;
>
> - rq_weight += weight;
> + sum_weight += weight;
> +
> shares += tg->cfs_rq[i]->shares;
> }
>
> + if (!rq_weight)
> + rq_weight = sum_weight;
> +
> if ((!shares && rq_weight) || shares > tg->shares)
> shares = tg->shares;
>
>
--
Yasunori Goto
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-12 1:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-03 2:26 Miao Xie
2009-11-05 2:56 ` Miao Xie
2009-11-10 0:22 ` Andrew Morton
2009-11-10 9:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-11 6:21 ` Yasunori Goto
2009-11-11 7:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-11 9:59 ` Yasunori Goto
2009-11-11 20:39 ` Chris Friesen
2009-11-11 20:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-11 10:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-12 1:12 ` Yasunori Goto [this message]
2009-11-19 7:09 ` Yasunori Goto
2009-12-09 9:55 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched: cgroup: Implement different treatment for idle shares tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091112095947.7229.E1E9C6FF@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®