From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: prepare for removal of experimental tag on PATA drivers
Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:53:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911141753.37935.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AFED444.5020201@gmail.com>
On Saturday 14 November 2009 17:01:08 Robert Hancock wrote:
> On 11/14/2009 08:37 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Push experimental tags to host drivers that still need it so we can
> > remove the "global" experimental tag for PATA drivers.
> >
> > I hear that some issues are being worked on but the patch reflects
> > the current situation and we can trivially update status of affected
> > host drivers after new fixes are merged.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz<bzolnier@gmail.com>
>
> I don't think that the problems you've mentioned fit the definition of
> the EXPERIMENTAL tag - it means that the driver isn't likely suitable
I guess you've read bugzillas so if you still think that EXPERIMENTAL
is not justified at least for some drivers than we really have nothing
to talk about anymore..
> for general use. Given that those drivers are probably used by
> significant numbers of people successfully in various distributions I
> don't think this is likely to be the case. There may be bugs but
> non-experimental does not imply bug free.
Hardly a technical argument.
You know that staging drivers are successfully used by
"significant numbers of people successfully in various distributions"?
:)
zbr explained the problem with the kernel development process with more
class than I would ever be able to so I will just save everybody's time..
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-14 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-14 14:37 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-11-14 15:23 ` Alan Cox
2009-11-14 16:01 ` Robert Hancock
2009-11-14 16:53 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-11-14 17:03 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200911141753.37935.bzolnier@gmail.com \
--to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=hancockrwd@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®