From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Put printk buffer in video ram
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:25:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091122082511.GC24558@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091122023237.GA6572@nowhere>
* Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 04:05:06AM +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > After doing some successful debugging by placing printk buffer in video
> > ram, here I publish cleaned version of it.
> >
> > I discovered that on my system video ram isn't cleared on reboot, and I
> > took advantage of that by placing printk buffer directly there.
> > This allows to capture oopses/panicks almost from everywhere.
> > It is also very simple to setup.
The idea is very, very nice!
If implemented cleanly and with a few more usability fixes this could be
a killer feature for laptop debugging. Persistent storage across reboots
- that's really nice.
( It wont help us debug crashes that require a power cycle - so it
probably will not help with s2ram failure debugging - but still it
widens the scope of printk based logging to critical crash scenarios:
early bootup crashes can be debugged via it and panics can be debugged
via it as well - as long as panic_timeout still works. )
> > Best regards,
> > Maxim Levitsky
> >
> > ---
> >
> > >From 77e0f4ffc531417d54ce928ade8481d82192b012 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:49:04 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] printk: Allow to store log buffer into video memory
> >
> > This patch adds new kernel parameter printk_address=
> > that will allow it to store the printk buffer in arbitary
> > (I/O) memory address.
> >
> > If you own a system that has discrete video ram, and it
> > isn't cleared automatically by BIOS on reboot, you
> > can use this as a black box recorder of crashes.
> >
> > If debugfs is enabled, log of last boot is copied into
> > system ram, and can be accessed via debugfs, for example
> > cat /sys/kernel/debug/printk/crash_dmesg
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/printk.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > lib/Kconfig.debug | 31 ++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
>
>
> kernel/printk.c does not seem to be the right place to do that
> but rather in a specific console driver.
> I would rather see it as an early console (for early printk), beside ttyS,
> vga and usb debug ports.
>
> Also, instead of creating another debugfs entry, you could just
> trigger the trace to the ftrace ring buffer, using trace_printk()
> for example.
>
> Hm?
>
> I personally would like to see such feature as I have no serial line
> in my laptop, although I'm not sure my graphical card would be happy
> with that...
I'd like to make it easy for distros to pipe regular printk's into this
buffer as well - and not tie it to some hassle-to-set-up early printk
mechanism. (early printk should tie into it too, to make it easier to
debug early crashes. User first boots into a kernel that crashes - then
can 'recover' the crashlog on a known-good kernel.)
But i agree with your observation that the hw dependent bits should not
go into kernel/printk.c - but this could be done cleanly at the console
driver level and be added to the VGA driver.
It should probably also tie into KMS/GEM to make sure it does not stomp
over video RAM that the GX driver might be using.
Furthermore, the printk_address=xyz boot parameter is way too difficult
for users to get right. This should be done as automatically as possible
- and the 'previous' printk buffer should be dumped into the 'next'
printk buffer during bootup. (preserving it for the regular syslog in a
compatible way and for kerneloops, etc.)
Creating a new /sys output channel just delays the adoption of such a
feature forever. It should be part of the printk infrastructure,
enable-able via a .config option but automatic otherwise.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-22 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-22 2:05 Maxim Levitsky
2009-11-22 2:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-22 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-11-22 12:15 ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-11-23 1:01 ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-11-23 18:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-23 18:55 ` Chris Friesen
2009-11-23 19:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-11-22 12:07 ` Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091122082511.GC24558@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®