From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934256AbZKXV0k (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:26:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934206AbZKXV0i (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:26:38 -0500 Received: from outbound-mail-21.bluehost.com ([69.89.21.16]:42288 "HELO outbound-mail-21.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S933537AbZKXV0h (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:26:37 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=SqqFl9T6tlTbhfnPTktLsJK0EqeUJF4Zb1ez2gscRq1ixSCRX5F9a6gGgA1AA1m29AteNY0O7haJA+m25kRD8MhxDl0J15eO3tjMj1emhvviSh1bPST4PJSKEb8TONUo; Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:26:35 -0800 From: Jesse Barnes To: Yinghai Lu Cc: David Woodhouse , Ingo Molnar , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: pci related patches 11-21-2009 Message-ID: <20091124132635.5fbe553c@jbarnes-piketon> In-Reply-To: <4B07A658.8080709@kernel.org> References: <4B07A658.8080709@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.18.3; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {10642:box514.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.28.251 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 00:35:36 -0800 Yinghai Lu wrote: > please check several patches from > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-2.6-yinghai.git > for-pci > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/yinghai/linux-2.6-yinghai.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-pci The DMAR stuff can just go through the DMAR tree. I don't see the two debug output patches on linux-pci, did you post them there? I commented on one of the resource patches, I'll check the other two (long standing leaf release and pciehp) ones again; I mainly want a bunch of tested-bys for those. The x86_pci_rootbus one looks ok I think, I'll see about applying that today. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center