From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Ananth Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, utrace-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [RFC,PATCH 07/14] ptrace: x86: change syscall_trace_leave() to rely on tracehook when stepping
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:01:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091124200152.GA5789@redhat.com> (raw)
(already in mm: ptrace-x86-change-syscall_trace_leave-to-rely-on-tracehook-when-stepping.patch)
Suggested by Roland.
Unlike powepc, x86 always calls tracehook_report_syscall_exit(step)
with step = 0, and sends the trap by hand.
This results in unnecessary SIGTRAP when PTRACE_SINGLESTEP follows
the syscall-exit stop.
Change syscall_trace_leave() to pass the correct "step" argument to
tracehook and remove the send_sigtrap() logic.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c | 21 +++++++--------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- V1/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c~7_X86_CONVERT_SYSCALL_LEAVE 2009-11-24 19:52:11.000000000 +0100
+++ V1/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c 2009-11-24 19:52:12.000000000 +0100
@@ -1528,29 +1528,22 @@ asmregparm long syscall_trace_enter(stru
asmregparm void syscall_trace_leave(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ bool step;
+
if (unlikely(current->audit_context))
audit_syscall_exit(AUDITSC_RESULT(regs->ax), regs->ax);
if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)))
trace_sys_exit(regs, regs->ax);
- if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE))
- tracehook_report_syscall_exit(regs, 0);
-
/*
* If TIF_SYSCALL_EMU is set, we only get here because of
* TIF_SINGLESTEP (i.e. this is PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP).
* We already reported this syscall instruction in
- * syscall_trace_enter(), so don't do any more now.
- */
- if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)))
- return;
-
- /*
- * If we are single-stepping, synthesize a trap to follow the
- * system call instruction.
+ * syscall_trace_enter().
*/
- if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP) &&
- tracehook_consider_fatal_signal(current, SIGTRAP))
- send_sigtrap(current, regs, 0, TRAP_BRKPT);
+ step = unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SINGLESTEP)) &&
+ !test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_EMU);
+ if (step || test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE))
+ tracehook_report_syscall_exit(regs, step);
}
reply other threads:[~2009-11-24 20:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091124200152.GA5789@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=utrace-devel@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®