From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759586AbZKZIS2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:18:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759454AbZKZIS1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:18:27 -0500 Received: from poutre.nerim.net ([62.4.16.124]:58729 "EHLO poutre.nerim.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759453AbZKZIS0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:18:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:18:29 +0100 From: Jean Delvare To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang Subject: Re: linux-next: i2c tree build warning Message-ID: <20091126091829.74d3b7ce@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20091126140600.2f55ab0e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20091126140600.2f55ab0e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.14.4; i586-suse-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Stephen, On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 14:06:00 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) produced this warning: > > drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c: In function 'at24_eeprom_read': > drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c:230: warning: format '%zd' expects type 'signed size_t', but argument 6 has type 'int' > > Introduced by commit 39bfab2519e6f148f2508d719f9fc5f4581aeefd ("at24: Use > timeout also for read"). Thanks for reporting. The warning did not show on my 32-bit x86 system, and I guess it did not show on Wolfram's system either, otherwise we'd have fixed it. Does the following patch fix the warning for you? --- linux-2.6.32-rc8.orig/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c 2009-11-26 09:14:45.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.32-rc8/drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c 2009-11-26 09:14:15.000000000 +0100 @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static ssize_t at24_eeprom_read(struct a if (status == 2) status = count; } - dev_dbg(&client->dev, "read %zu@%d --> %zd (%ld)\n", + dev_dbg(&client->dev, "read %zu@%d --> %d (%ld)\n", count, offset, status, jiffies); if (status == count) If it does then I'll merge this into Wolfram's patch. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare