From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]cfq-iosched: make nonrot check logic consistent
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 13:00:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091203120021.GN8742@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091203115707.GL8742@kernel.dk>
On Thu, Dec 03 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03 2009, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > Send again, last post seems lost.
> >
> > cfq_arm_slice_timer() has logic to disable idle window for SSD device. The same
> > thing should be done at cfq_select_queue() too, otherwise we will still see
> > idle window. This makes the nonrot check logic consistent in cfq.
> > Tests in a intel SSD with low_latency knob close, below patch can triple disk
> > thoughput for muti-thread sequential read.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> > ---
> > block/cfq-iosched.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux.orig/block/cfq-iosched.c 2009-11-11 13:44:00.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux/block/cfq-iosched.c 2009-11-11 13:45:33.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -1215,7 +1215,8 @@ static struct cfq_queue *cfq_select_queu
> > * conditions to happen (or time out) before selecting a new queue.
> > */
> > if (timer_pending(&cfqd->idle_slice_timer) ||
> > - (cfqq->dispatched && cfq_cfqq_idle_window(cfqq))) {
> > + (cfqq->dispatched && cfq_cfqq_idle_window(cfqq)
> > + && !(blk_queue_nonrot(cfqd->queue) && cfqd->hw_tag))) {
> > cfqq = NULL;
> > goto keep_queue;
> > }
>
> Thanks, applied to 2.6.33 queue.
On second check, we now hide that logic in cfq_should_idle() and as such
your patch no longer applies. I suggest you re-test with -next or my
for-2.6.33 branch, it has a big number of pending CFQ updates for
2.6.33.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-03 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-03 3:51 Shaohua Li
2009-12-03 11:57 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-03 12:00 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-12-04 8:21 ` Shaohua Li
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-11 6:15 Shaohua Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091203120021.GN8742@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome